Index to 300 Glacier Posts & North Cascade Glacier Climate Project 2013 Field Season

Below is a list of the 300 individual glacier posts examining our warming climates impact on each glacier, this represents the first 4 years of posts. I have worked directly on 52 of the glaciers noted. The others are prompted by fine research that I had come across, cited in each post or inquiries from readers, or just glaciers that nobody has focused upon. I then look for satellite imagery spanning a period of time to identify change. Most of the imagery comes from Landsat, thanks to its long term archive of free images. Some imagery is from MODIS, Geoeye or Google Earth. There is a consistent signal from the glaciers, mass balance loss, thinning and retreat. In many cases this leads to new lake formation or lake expansion for alpine glaciers. For the next three weeks there will be no new posts as I will be in the field.

North Cascade Glacier Climate Project 2013 Field Season, 30th Annual

This will be the 30th consecutive year heading into the field to assess North Cascade glaciers. Over the next three weeks we will be measuring snow depth and melt at over 2000 locations on 10 different North Cascade glaciers. We will be mapping changes in the terminus position on 12 glaciers and surface elevation on specific profiles on 6 glaciers. The decent winter left the region with average snowpack as of May 1. Spring melting began on May 3, and the melt season has preceded with drier and warmer conditions than typical. The main crew will consist of Stewart Willis from WWU, Jill Pelto UMaine (5 years), Ben Pelto UMASS-Amherst (9 years) and myself (30 years). We will begin as usual at Columbia Glacier, where we will be joined by Tom Hammond (11 years) of the North Cascades Conservation Council and Alan Kearney, photographer. We will then head to the north side of Mount Baker for a week on Sholes Glacier, Lower Curtis Glacier, Rainbow Glacier and Ptarmigan Ridge Glacier. We will be joined here by Matt Holland, WWU, Jezra Beaulieu and Oliver Grah, Nooksack Indian Tribe. We will focus on installing ablation stakes here and measurement of streamflow including emplacement of two streamflow sensors below the glaciers to help the Nooksack Tribe identify how declining glacier area is going to impact summer streamflow and salmon in the Nooksack River. We then head to the Easton Glacier and Deming Glacier. On Easton Glacier we will again be joined by Tom Hammond. Last is Mount Daniels with the Ice Worm, Daniels and Lynch Glacier.

 

United States
Columbia Glacier, Washington
Lyman Glacier, Washington
Whitechuck Glacier
Boulder Glacier, Washington
Roosevelt Glacier
Deming Glacier Icefall, Washington
Deming Glacier, Washington
Hidden Creek, Washington
Lower Curtis Glacier Annual Survey, Washington
Easton Glacier Assessment, Washington
Mount Baker Mass balance, Washington
Ptarmigan Ridge Glacier, Washington
Dusty Glacier, Washington
Neve Glacier, Washington
Anderson Glacier, Washington
Eel Glacier, Washington
Milk Lake Glacier, Washington
Suiattle Glacier, Washington
Paradise Glacier, Washington
Easton Glacier, Washington
Redoubt Glacier, Washington
Honeycomb Glacier, Washington
Vista Glacier, Washington
Rainbow Glacier, Washington
Daniels Glacier, Washington
Colonial Glacier, Washington
Quien Sabe Glacier, Washington
Mazama Glacier
Fairchild Glacier, Washington
White Glacier, Washington
Banded Glacier, Washington
Borealis Glacier, Washington
Hinman Glacier, Washington
Lower Curtis Glacier, Washington
Mount Baker Glaciers, Washington
McAllister Glacier, Washington
Lewis Glacier, Washington
Kennedy Glacier, Washington
Fremont Glacier, Wyoming
Minor Glacier, Wyoming
Knife Point Glacier, Wyoming
Bastion Glacier, Wyoming
Sourdough Glacier, Wyoming
Grasshopper Glacier, Wyoming
Grasshopper Glacier, Montana
Harrison Glacier, Montana
McDonald Glacier, Montana
Sperry Glacier, Montana
Hopper Glacier, Montana
Old Sun Glacier, Montana
Yakutat Glacier, Alaska
Grand Plateau Glacier, Alaska
Eagle Glacier, Alaska
Gilkey Glacier, Alaska
Fork Glacier, Alaska
Gilkey Glacier ogives, Alaska
Norris Glacier
Lemon Creek Glacier, Alaska
Taku Glacier, Alaska
Bear Lake Glacier, Alaska
Riggs Glacier
Chickamin Glacier, Alaska
Okpilak Glacier, Alaska
Sawyer Glacier, Alaska
Valdez Glacier, Alaska
Antler Glacier, Alaska
Field Glacier
East Taklanika Glacier, Alaska
Gold Rush Glacier
Brady Glacier, Alaska
Brady Glacier Retreat lake expansion 2004-2010, Alaska
Thiel Glacier, Alaska
Excelsior Glacier, Alaska
Speel Glacier, Alaska
Patterson Glacier, Alaska
Romanzof Glacier, Alaska
Pedersen Glacier, Alaska

Juneau Icefield, Alaska 1984-2013

Canada
Icemantle Glacier, BC
Bridge Glacier, British Columbia
Porcupine Glacier, British Columbia
Snowcap Creek
Stave Glacier, British Columbia
Washmawapta Glacier, British Columbia
Bubagoo Glacier, British Columbia
Hector Glacier, Alberta
Helm Glacier, British Columbia
Jacobsen Glacier, British Columbia
Melbern Glacier
Warren Glacier, British Columbia
Castle Creek Glacier, British Columbia
Hoboe Glacier, British Columbia
Coleman Glacier, British Columbia
Tulsequah Glacier, British Columbia
Des Poilus Glacier, British Columbia
Decker and Spearhead Glacier, British Columbia
Columbia Glacier, British Columbia
Freshfield Glacier, British Columbia
Apex Glacier, British Columbia
Galaxy Glacier, British Columbia
Great Glacier, British Columbia
Devon Ice Cap, Nunavut
Dexterity Ice Cap Baffin Island
Penny ice Cap, Nunavut
Northern Outlet Devon Ice Cap, Nunavut
Penny Ice Cap SW, Nunavut
Mittie Glacier, Ellesmere Island, Nunavut
Snowshoe Peak, Yukon
Petain Glacier, Alberta
Saskatchewan Glacier, Alberta

Himalaya
Ngozumpa Glacier, Nepal
West Barun Glacier, Nepal
Khumbu Glacier, Nepal
Imja Glacier, Nepal
Reqiang Glacier Retreat, Nepal
Kali Gandaki Headwaters, Nepal
Samudra Tupa, India
Malana Glacier, India
Warwan Basin, India
Sara Umaga Glacier, India
Kedarnath Floods, India
Jaonli Glacier, India
Jaundhar Barnak Glacier, India
Zemu Glacier, Sikkim
North Lhonak Glacier, Sikkim
Changsang Glacier, Sikkim
Gangotri Glacier, India
Milam Glacier, India
Satopanth Glacier, India
Hakakabo Razi Glacier, Myanmar
Theri Kang Glacier, Bhutan
Zemestan Glacier, Afghanistan
Emend River Headwaters, Afghanistan
Yajun Peak Glacier, Afghanistan
Godur Glaicer, Pakistan
Tirich Mir, Pakistan
Longbasba Glacier, Tibet
Menlung Glacier, Tibet
Boshula Glaciers, Tibet
Urumquihe Glacier, Tibet
Lumding Glacier, Tibet
Matsang Tsanpo Glacier, Tibet
Jiongla Glacier, Tibet
Rongbuk Glacier, Tibet
Zayul Chu Headwaters, Tibet
Bode Zangbo Headwaters, Tibet
Dzhungharia Alatau, Kazakhstan
Petrov Glacier,Kyrgyzstan
Hailuogou Glacier, China
Sepu Kangri, China
Himalaya Glacier Index

Europe
Taconnaz GLacier, France
Mer de Glace, France
Dargentiere Glacier, France
Glacier du Tour, France
Glacier de la Girose
Glacier Blanc
Grand Motte and Pramort Glacier Tignes Ski area, France
Saint Sorlin, France
Sommelier Glacier, France
Obeeraar Glacier, Austria
Obersulzbach Glacier, Austria
Rotmoosferner, Austria
Viltragenkees, Austria
Stubai Glacier, Austria
Sulztalferner, Austria
Hallstatter Glacier, Austria
Ochsentaler Glacier, Austria
Pitzal Glacier, Austria
Dosde Glacier, Italy
Presena Glacier, Italy
Forni Glacier, Italy
Careser Glacier, Italy
Lobbia Glacier, Italy
Sabbione Glacier Retreat, Italy
Malavalle Glacier, Italy
Triftgletscher, Switzerland
Gietro Glacier, Switzerland
Ried Glacier, Switzerland
Cavagnoli Glacier, Switzerland
Chuebodengletscher and Ghiacciaio-del-Pizzo-Rotondo, Switzerland
Peridido Glacier, Spain
Maladeta Glacier, Spain
Engabreen, Norway
Midtdalsbreen, Norway
Tunsbergdalsbreen, Norway
Lodalsbreen, Norway
Strupbreen and Koppangsbreen, Norway
Blamannsisen
Rembesdalsskaka, Norway
TungnaarJokull, Iceland
Langjökull, Iceland
Gigjokull, Iceland
Porisjokull, Iceland
Skeidararjokull, Iceland
Kotlujokull, Iceland
Lednik Fytnargin, Russia
Kirtisho Glacier, Georgia
Lednik Kauraugom, Russia
Irik Glacier, Mount Elbrus, Russia

Greenland and European Arctic
Mittivakkat Glacier
Ryder Glacier
Humboldt Glacier
Petermann Glacier
Kuussuup Sermia
Thrym Glacier Retreat
Tiningnilik Glacier Lake
Jakobshavn Isbrae
Tracy Gletscher
79 Glacier
Zachariae Isstrom
Umiamako Glacier
Alison Gletscher
Kong Oscar Glacier
De Reste Bugt
Qaleraliq Glacier
Upernavik Glacier
Quinngua Avannarleq
Apuserajik Glacier
Epiq Sermia
Puisortoq North
Dodge and Storm Glacier
Sarqardliup Seremia
Steensby Glacier
Sortebrae Glacier, Greenland
Bussemand Glacier
Narssap Sermia
Severnaya Zemlya, Russian Arctic
Hansbreen, Svalbard
Nannbreen, Svalbard
Hornbreen and Hambergbreen, Svalbard
Olsokbreen, Svalbard
Albrechtbreen, Svalbard
Svitjodbreen, Svalbard
Roze and Sredniy Glacier, Novaya Zemyla
Nizkiy and Glazova Glacier, Novaya Zemyla
Krivosheina, Novaya Zemlya
Chernysheva Glacier, Novaya Zemlya
Taisija Glacier, Novaya Zemlya

South America
Colonia Glacier, Chile
Glaciar Steffen, Chile
Artesonraju Glacier, Peru
Nef Glacier, Chile
Tyndall Glacier, Chile
Alemania Glacier, Chile
Zongo Glacier, Bolivia
Nevado Cololo, Bolivia
Laramcota Glacier, Bolivia
Sierra Nevade del Cocuy Glaciers, Colombia
Ritacuba Blanco Glacier, Colombia
Llaca Glacier, Peru
Joerg Montt Glacier, Chile
Nororeste Glacier, Chile
Arhuey Glacier, Peru
Seco Glacier, Argentina
Onelli Glacier, Argentina
Quelccaya Ice Cap, Peru
Manon Glacier, Peru
Corihuasi Glacier, Peru
Chuecon Glacier
Glacier Gualas, Chile

Antarctica and Circum Antarctic Islands
Pine Island Glacier
Fleming Glacier
Hariot Glacier
Smith Glacier, Antarctica
Thwaites Glacier, Antarctica
Amsler Island
Stephenson Glacier, Heard Island
Neumayer, South Georgia
Ampere, Kerguelen
Lapparent Outlet, Kerguelen Island
Cook Ice Cap, Kerguelen Island
Nordenskjold Coast, Antarctic Peninsula
Prospect Glacier, Antarctic Peninsula
Ross Hindle Glacier, South Georgia
Twitcher Glacier, South Georgia
Herz Glacier, South Georgia
Vega Island Ice Cap
Rohss Bay, James Ross Island, Antarctica
Jones Ice Shelf, Antarctica
Sheldon Glacier, Antarctica

New Zealand
Tasman Glacier
Tasman Glacier 2013 update
Murchison Glacier
Donne Glacier
Mueller Glacier, NZ
Gunn Glacier, NZ
Douglas Glacier Neve, NZ

Africa
Rwenzori Glaciers
Tyndall Glacier, Kenya

North Cascade Glacier Climate Project Reports

Forecasting Glacier Survival
North Cascade Glacier Mass Balance 2010
Columbia Glacier Annual Time Lapse
North Cascade Glacier Climate Project 2009 field season
28th Field Season Schedule of the North Cascade Glacier Climate Project
North Cascade Glacier Climate Project 2011 Field Season
BAMS 2010 alpine glaciers
BAMS 2011 Alpine Glaciers
2011 Glacier mass balance North Cascades and Juneau Icefield
Taku Glacier TSL Paper
Glacier Ground Truth 2012 North Cascade Field Season
North Cascade Glacier Climate Project 2012 Field Season

Tracy Gletscher Retreat 1987-2013, Northwest Greenland

Tracy Gletscher in Northwest Greenland has experienced an accelerated retreat since 2000. Here we utilize Landsat imagery from 1987-2013 to examine this retreat. Rignot et al (2001) identified the centerline velocity as it entered the final fjord reach, 25-30km from the terminus, of 500 m/year, with a thickness of 1200 meters.
Sakakibara (2011) noted an increased retreat of 3.1 km from 2000-2011. The noted an acceleration of the glacier from 1988 to 2011 with velocities of 2 km per year 10 km behind the calving front. The 1991 geologic map of the area from GEUS indicates the tributary from the north, Farquhar Glacier, joined with the Tracy Gletscher at the terminus. tracy map In the Landsat images the ice front of both of these glacier is indicated by red dots. The 2013 terminus location of Tracy Gletscher is indicated by a pink arrow and the yellow arrow indicates the tip of a peninsula where the southern margin of Tracy Gletscher was in 1988. There is a quite a number of large icebergs beyond the terminus in 1987, 1991 and 2000. The termini are still joined in 2000. By 2009 the glaciers are separated and have retreated into their respective fjords. By 2013 the main Tracy terminus is aligned with a kink in the lateral moraine, pink arrow. The retreat since 1987 of the main terminus has been 3 km on the southern margin, 5.5 km on the northern margin and 9 km for the center tongue. With most all of the retreat occurring since 2000. This higher retreat rate for the 1992-2000 period as the tongue collapsed is noted by Moon and Joughin (2008). The retreat is similar to that of nearby Dodge and Storm Glacier, and Kong Oscar Glacier. This glacier falls into a long list of retreating glaciers of all types in all regions of Greenland. tracy glacier 1987

tracy glacier 1991

tracy glacier 2000

tracy glacier 2009

tracy glacier 2012

tracy glacier 2013

Glacier Contribution Kedarnath Flood in June 2013

On June 16 and 17th 2013 catastrophic flooding occurred in Kedarnath, Uttarakhand, India due to excessive monsoon rains and the failure of a glacier moraine dammed lake. A detailed description of what led to the combined flows of the Mandakini and Saraswati River overwhelming Kedernath is provided by Dobhal et al (2013) in the most recent Current Science. issue. Here that analysis is supplemented with Landsat imagery from before and after the event. In each image Kedarnath is indicated with a yellow arrow and Chorabari Lake a red arrow. Chorabari Lake is impounded by the lateral moraine of the Chorabari Glacier and is a largely snow and rain fed lake that is not always present. The lake is adjacent to the terminus of debris covered Chorabari Glacier. In the Landsat images from 2000 and 2002 the lake is quite evident, and Kedarnath is on the outwash plain between the Saraswati and Mandakini River just 2 km from the lake and end of the glacier. The 2012 Landsat image is not as clear but the lake is still evident. In all three of these images there is a bright green vegetated area (GP) just north of Kedarnath that is between the Companion and Chorabari Glacier, protected by the lateral moraines of each.

kedarnath map

The vegetation resumes immediately after Kedarnath. In the 2013 Landsat imagery from June 23 and June 30th the lake is no longer present. The extent of the vegetative free area around Kedarnath has expanded after the flooding. Dobhal et al (2013) report that, “…WIHG meteorological observatory at Chorabari Glacier camp recorded 210 mm rainfall in 12 hours between 15 June (5:00 p.m.) and 16 June (5:00 a.m.). On 16 June 2013 alone (from 5:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.), 115 mm rainfall was recorded, causing 325 mm rain in 24 hours. The Chorabari Lake is a snow melt and rain fed lake, located about 2 km upstream of Kedarnath town which is approximately 400 m long, 200 m wide having a depth of 15–20 m. The bursting of this lake led to its complete draining within 5–10 min as reported by the watch and ward staff of the Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology (WIHG) who were present in WIHG camp at Chorabari Glacier on 16 June and early morning of 17 June 2013. The heavy rainfall together with melting of snow in the surrounding Chorabari Lake washed off both the banks of the Mandakini River causing massive devastation to the Kedarnath town.” The glaciers in this area have been retreating, which has led to formation of many new lakes, and has led to further vertical exposure of the lateral moraines from the Little Ice Age. The decreased buttressing of the moraines, the enhanced melting, and glacier retreat is leading to enhanced glacier involved outburst floods. Jaundhar Barak, Jaonli and Gangotri Glacier are other local glaciers impacted by recent retreat.
kedarnath 2000
2000 Landsat image

kedarnath 2002
2002 Landsat image

kedarnath 2012
2012 Landsat image

kedarnath 2013b
June 30, 2013 Landsat image

kedarnath 2013
June 23, 2013 Landsat image

Strupbreen and Koppangsbreen Glacier Retreat, Northern Norway

Strupbreen and Koppangsbreen are in Lyngen region of northern Norway, draining into Lyngen Fjord. the glaciers share an accumulation area and have a joint area of 14 square kilometers, which is the 24th largest glacier in Norway in the NVE inventory (The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate). The nearby Langfjordjokulen, measured by NVE , had negative mass balances for 14 consecutive years from 1997-2010, leading to a 370 m retreat from 2000-2010. Koppangsbreen retreat as assessed by NVE is 168 m from 2000-2010. Here we examine the retreat and formation of two new lakes at the terminus of these glaciers using Landsat imagery from 1990, 2002 and 2011. The yellow arrow indicates the terminus of Koppangsbreen, the red arrow Strupbreen, and the green arrow a location on the ice divide between the glaciers. Both glaciers end at about 500 m, and the distance to sea level is a mere 1.5 km for Strupbreen and 2 km for Koppangsbreen which leads to some spectacular waterfalls. strupbreen ge
Google Earth image

In 1990 there is a tiny sliver of a lake apparent at the end of Koppangsbreen and not lake at the end of Strupbreen. At the ice divide there is no exposed bedrock knob in 1990. By 2002 there is no lake at the end of Strupbreen and a small oval lake partly snow filled is at the end of Koppangsbreen. The ice divide is still all snow and ice. In 2011 the ice divide is interrupted by a bedrock knob that is 150 m long. This indicates thinning of the glacier even at 900 m. A lake has formed at the end of Strupbreen, and the glacier has retreated 300 m since 1990. Koppangsbreen has retreated 250 m since 1990 and the new lake at the terminus is now 300 m across. The two glaciers are a destination for glacier walking treks from the Lyngen Lodge, providing some excellent images of the terminus lakes. The retreat of these two glaciers follows the pattern of others in northern Norway, including Engabreen and Blamannsisen. strupbreen 1990
1990 Landsat image

strupbreen 2002
2002 Landsat image

strupbreen 2011
2011 Landsat image

Taisija Glacier Retreat, Novaya Zemlya

Taisija is an outlet glacier that drains the northern side of the Novaya Zemlya Ice Cap into the Barents Sea. This outlet glacier is just southwest of Chernysheva Glacier, and like that glacier has retreated from an island since 1988. The glacier has been retreating like all tidewater glaciers in northern Novaya Zemlya (LEGOS, 2006) taisij ge Google Earth Image

Here we examine the glacier using Landsat imagery from 1988-2013. In 1988 the glacier terminus was grounded on an island near the center of the glacier, yellow arrow. The western margin purple arrow is near the tip of a peninsula. On the east side an embayment exists in 1988 and the terminus is on a small island, red arrow. The green arrow indicates a glacier dammed lake that is full in 1988 on the neigboring glacier Kraynij Glacier. By 2006 the glacier center is still grounded on the island. An embayment has formed on the west side of the glacier and it has retreated from the peninsula. On the east side the glacier has retereated from the island, though this embayment has some sea ice in it that makes the retreat less evident. The glacier dammed lake is partially filled. By 2011 the glacier in the center has retreated from the island. The embayments on the east and the west have both expanded. The glacier dammed lake is empty. In June 2013 a Landsat 8 image provides a clearer perspective, the eastern embayment still has sea ice, but has pulled well back from the thin island at the red arrow. The retreat of this glacier is 1 kilometer on the west, 1.2 km in the center and 1.5 km on the west since 1988. This retreat is similar to that of Chernysheva, Krivosheina, Roze and Sredniy
taisij 19881988 Landsat image

taisij 20062006 Landsat image

taisij 2011
2011 Landsat image
taisij 2013
2013 Landsat 8 image

Chernysheva Glacier Retreat, Novaya Zemlya

Chernysheva Glacier is on the northwest coast of Novaya Zemlya. The glacier terminates in the Barents Sea and has been retreating like all tidewater glaciers in northern Novaya Zemlya (LEGOS, 2006) This glaciers retreat follows the pattern of Krivosheina, Roze and Sredniy and Taisija Glacier. In this post we examine the changes using Landsat imagery from 1988, 2006 and 2011. The flow of the glacier from the main ice cap is indicated by blue arrows. The yellow arrow in each image indicates an island, the red arrow a bedrock ridge that extends under the ice, and the pink arrow the east margin of the terminus in 1988.

chernysheva ge
Google Earth image

In 1988 the glacier ended on the island which is a pinning point that would limit calving at the time. The 1988 image is very clear and the ridge with the bulge in the ice over it seems to extend 70% of the way across the glacier. In 2006 the glacier has pulled back from the island, there is however sea ice between the glacier front and the island, which has several icebergs embedded in it. By 2011 the glacier retreat from this island is 3100 m. The retreat from the east margin is 2600 m. The bedrock ridge at the red arrow should provide some stability and slow the retreat rate on the west side, it does not appear to extend to the eastern margin and this may continue to retreat apace. Interestingly the embayment here is very similar to that of Nizkiy and Glasova Glacier, which must be due to the similar geology. The reduction in duration of Barents Sea ice cover ice in front of the glacier has certainly helped to increase recent retreat.
chernysheva 1988 1988 Landsat image

chernysheva 2006
2006 Landsat image

chernysheva 2011
2011 Landsat image

Blåmannsisen Outlet Glacier Retreat, northern Norway

Blåmannsisen is the fifth largest ice cap in Norway, just ahead of Hardanger in the Inventory of Norwegian Glaciers published by NVE in 2012. The ice cap is not tapped for hydropower and has not been the target of much research as a result from the NVE, second image is from NVE report. The ice cap outlet glaciers drain into a number of lakes. The NVE inventory indicates a reduction in area of the ice cap during the 20th century from 124 to 87 square kilometers. There is no change indicated for the 1961 to 1999 period. In the last 20 years retreat has become evident. blamannsisenblamannsisen terminusHere we examine the terminus change of two outlets one on the north side of the ice cap (yellow arrow) and one at the southwest corner (red arrow). For the northern outlet glacier three changes are emphasized. First at the terminus at the arrow point the expansion of the terminus lake from a small pond in 1994, 100 by 100 m, to a lake that is one kilometer long and 100 to 400 m wide in 2011. The progression of the lake development is steady with expansion evident in 1999 and 2006. The second noteworthy item is the ice connection of the outlet glacier to the main ice cap, yellow dots. This connection has narrowed from 1300 m in 1994 to 800 m in 2011. This in particular is apparent above Point A, which in 1994 is a bedrock knob surrounded by the glacier, a small nunatak. In 1999 Point A is still a nunatak. In 2006 the nunatak is just barely surrounded by ice, and in 2011 it is now just the extension of a ridge. The problem with the narrowing connection to the main ice cap, due to thinning ice, is less inflow, which will hasten the retreat. As is evident in 2006 and 2011 this glacier is becoming dynamically separated from the ice cap and has little retained snowcover of its own. Notice that as you cross onto the main ice cap there is no snowcover. This terminus has retreated 150 m on the west side and 400 m on the east side since 1994.

The second terminus is at the red arrow and has retreated from 1994 to 2011 exposing a new bedrock peninsula in the lake at the tip of the red arrow. This bedrock exposure at the tip of the red arrow was surrounded by glacier ice in 1994 and 1999. By 2006 the terminus had pulled back from this area, the bedrock exposure had expanded and ice no longer passed south of it either. By 2011 next to the letter B a small bedrock knob is being exposed at the terminus by continued retreat. The retreat of this outlet has been 500 m on the south side and 200 m on the north side since 1994. This glaciers retreat began later than at another northern Norwegian glacier Engabreen and more slowly and less dramatically than southern Norway glaciers such as Tunsbergdalsbreen, as noted by the annual frontal change studies of NVEblamannsisen 1994
1994 Landsat image
blamannsisen 1999
1999 Landsat image

blamannsisen 2006
2006 Landsat image
blamannsisen 2011
2011 Landsat image

Mittivakkat, Greenland and Lemon Creek Glacier, Alaska transient snowline paper

Mernild et al (2013) is a new paper that has authors from several countries that I am co-author on with Knudsen, Malmros in Denmark, Hanna from UK, Yde currently in Norway and Mernild in Chile. The key items here are using the snow line observed on any particular melt season day (transient snowline=TSL) as input for mass balance assessment. This paper examines how similar the migration of the TSL is from year to year, and how ablation rate can be determined using it, when field data can be used for validation. The first two images are figures from the paper of Lemon Creek Glacier and Mittivakkat Glacier illustrating the TSL at various dates. A second key is that if the progression is relatively repeatable towards the end of the melt season, than the equilibrium line altitude (ELA) can be determined, snowline at the end of the melt season, which is a key mass balance variable. Clouds often obscure the ELA from satellite image assessment, and this allows appropriate extrapolation. The figure below needs more data to determine the consistency and nature of the TSL variation at the end of the melt season, the ELA is the top of the parabola. lemon creek base map4
Base map of Lemon Creek Glacier in 2003 with colored lines indicating various dates of the TSL.

fig 3 aw
Base map of Miitivakkat Glacier in 2012 with colored lines indicating various dates of the TSL.

tsl-ela
Progression of the TSL approximated with a second order Polynomial, to help derive the ELA.

A good example of the utility is an examination of the Landsat 8 imagery from this summer. Alaska had a warm and relatively clear weather period that provided a rare chance to examine the TSL in three consecutive satellite passes on June 14, June 21 and June 30. This period began with the glacier almost completely snow covered, red dots indicate TSL, red arrow indicates the 6/30 TSL. On June 14 the TSL was at 775 m within a couple of hundred meters of the terminus. By 6/21 the TSl had moved up the northwest side of the glacier 1.5 km to an altitude of 900m. On June 30th the TSL was at 975m two kilometers from the terminus. This progression up the northwest side of the glacier is typical. At the start of July the glacier is still 90% snowcovered. The Juneau Icefield Research Program is on this glacier in early July and field work will be critical to identifying snow depths above the TSL, that the TSL will transect later in the summer identifying ablation. The yellow arrow indicates the formation of Lake Linda, a meltwater lake that forms on the glacier, the expansion from June 14 to June 30 is evident. Pictures of the lake from JIRP during self arrest practice are gorgeous. More detailed examination of the longer term change of Lemon Creek Glacier and Mittivakkat Glacier has been completed.lemon creek 165-2013
June 14 2013 Landsat image

lemon creek 172-2013
June 21 2013 Landsat image

lemon creek 181-2013
June 30 2013 Landsat image

Juneau Icefield Glacier Terminus Change from Landsat 5 1984 to Landsat 8 2013

The Juneau Icefield Research Program (JIRP) has been examining the glaciers of the Juneau Icefield since 1946. Until the NASA Landsat program began field measurements and aerial observations were the only means to observe the glaciers of the icefield. For more than 40 years it was Maynard Miller, U of Idaho, who led this expedition that has trained so many of today’s glaciologists, today it is Jeff Kavanaugh, U of Alberta. Given the difficult weather conditions that produce the 4000+ square kilometers of glaciers, this was not a task that could be done comprehensively. Here we examine the changes from the August 17, 1984 Landsat 5 image to the June 21, 2013 image from newly launched Landsat 8. Landsat 5 was launched in 1984, Landsat 8 launched in 2013. The Landsat images have become a key resource in the examination of the mass balance of these glaciers (Pelto, 2011). The August 17th 1984 image is the oldest Landsat image that I consider of top quality. I was on the Llewellyn Glacier with JIRP on the east side of the icefield the day this image was taken. On June 21, 2013 JIRP’s annual program had not begun, but the field season is now underway once again observing fin and reporting from the field across this icefield.
Post reblogged at NASA

First we have the two reference images of the entire icefield that indicate the location of the 12 main glaciers we focus on here. Followed by a chart indicating the amount of terminus change, 14 glaciers have retreated and one has advanced.
This is followed by 12 closeup glacier by glacier comparisons of the terminus, with the 1984 image always on the left and 2013 on the right, the 1984 margin is marked with red dots and the 2013 with yellow dots. This is an update to an examination of the Juneau Icefield terminus changes from 1948 to 2005. There are also links to more detailed discussions for each glacier, as the focus here is on the 1984 to 2013 changes visible in the images here. The images were first overlain in ArcGIS and the terminus change based on three measurements one at the glacier terminus midpoint, one each halfway to the margin from the mid-point. The exception is the Taku Glacier which is based on the JIRP field measurement mean and the Llewellyn where three measurements are made on each of the two termini, the average is then rounded to the nearest 100 m. The ongoing retreats reflects the long term negative mass balance of the glaciers with the exception of the Taku Glacier. The ongoing warming of our globe will continue to lead to retreat. The glaciers are all fed from the central portion of the icefield that always has a large snow covered area even at the end of recent warm summers.
juneau icefield 1984
August 17, 1984 Landsat 5 image: N=Norris, L=Lemon Creek, M=Mendenall, H=Herbert, E=Eagle, G=Gilkey, A=Antler, F=Field, LL=Llewellyn, Tu=Tulsequah, TW=Twin and T=Taku.

Juneau icefield 2013
June 21, 2013 Landsat 8 image

JIF terminus
1984-2013 chart of terminus change of individual glaciers from 1984 to 2013, see individual images below for the observed changes.

norris glacier change
From 1984 to 2011 Norris Glacier has retreated 1100 m. The glacier terminus that has been ending in a proglacial lake for the last 40 years is now mostly grounded. Since 1984 the northern half of this lake has formed and the long term lake development is discussed in a more detailed discussion on Norris Glacier.

lemon glacier change
In 1984 Lemon Creek Glacier (L) has pulled back 300 m from a small lake it reached in 1984. Lemon Creek Glacier has a long term mass balance record that indicates more than 15 m of thinning from 1984 to 2012. This thinning is more dramatic than the 300 m retreat that has occurred. The yellow arrow indicates a tributary that no longer connects to the glacier.

mendenhall glacier change Mendenhall Glacier is the most visited and photographed terminus in the region. The glacier in 1984 ended at the tip of a prominent peninsula in Mendenhall Lake. By 2013 the terminus has retreated 1200 m, with an equal expansion of the lake. The red arrows indicate a tributary that decreased dramatically in width and contribution to the main glacier. This is the location of Suicide Basin, where a lake has formed the last two summers and then rapidly drained. A nice set of images of the glacier are provided by Matt Beedle.

herbert glacier change
Herbert Glacier has retreated 600 m since 1984. The width of the terminus has also declined. The red arrow indicates a tributary that no longer feeds the main glacier.

eagle glacier change Eagle Glacier has retreated from the edge of a lake in 1984. The retreat of 1100 m is rivaled by the width reduction of the glacier in the lower 3 km. Eagle Glacier‘s ongoing retreat is examined in more detail.

gilkey glacier change Gilkey Glacier had begun to retreat into a proglacial lake by 1984, the lake was still just 1 km long. A short distance above the terminus the Gilkey was joined by the sizable tributaries of the Thiel and Battle Glacier. By 2013 the glacier has retreated 3200 m, the lake is now 4 km long. Thiel and Battle Glacier have separated from the Gilkey Glacier and from each other. Thiel Glacier retreated 2600 m from its junction with Gilkey Glacier from 1984-2013 and Battle Glacier 1400 m from its junction with Thiel Glacier

antler glacier 2013 Antler Glacier is actually a distributary glacier of the Bucher Glacier, which in turns joins the Gilkey Glacier. As this glacier has thinned, less ice has overtopped the lip of the valley that Antler occupies. In 1984 Antler Glacier was 3 km long descending the valley to end near a proglacial lake, that it had recently occupied. By 2013 the glacier was just 400 m long, having lost 2600 m of its length.

field glacier change Field Glacier in 1984 ended at the edge of an outwash plain with a few glimpses of a lake developing near its margin. By 2013 a substantial lake has formed at the terminus and the glacier has retreated 2300 m. A lake has also developed at the first terminus joining from the east, most of the width of this glacier has been lost. It is clear that the two lakes will merge as the retreat continues.

lewellyn glacier change The second largest glacier of the icefield is the Llewellyn Glacier which is in British Columbia. The glacier has several termini, here we examine two of them that have retreated 900 m from 1984-2013. Hoboe Glacier is another terminus that has been examined, but not in this post. This has led to formation of new lakes, and water level changes in existing lakes. Matt Beedle has examined the recent changes at the terminus.

tulsequah glacier change Tulsequah Glacier in 1984 ended at an outwash plain with a small marginal lake beginning to develop, red arrow. By 2013 a large proglacial lake has developed due to the 2500 m retreat. A side valley down which a distributary tongue of the glacier flowed in 1984 has retreated out of the valley by 2013, pink arrow.

twin glacier change The East and West Twin Glacier are receding up separate fjords, though they are fed from a joint accumulation zone. The East Twin is a narrower glacier and has retreated 900 m. The West Twin has retreated 600 m, at an elbow in the fjord. Elbows like this are often good pinning points that are a more stable setting, once the glacier retreats out of the Elbow retreat should speed up.

taku Glacier change Taku Glacier is the largest glacier of the icefield and unlike all the others it has been advancing non-stop over the last century. The sustained positive mass balance from 1946-2012 has driven this advance (Pelto, 2011), this led to the glacier thickenning along its entire length. Since 1950 observations of velocity near the snowline of the glacier by JIRP indicates that the glacier has had a remarkably steady flow over the past 50 years (Pelto et al, 2008). Since 1988 the glacier has not been thickening near the snowline as mass balance has declined. We have been able to observe the snowline movement in satellite images to help determine the mass balance. The changes at the glacier front are quite variable as the glacier advances. JIRP measurements of the terminus indicate this from 2001-2008 with an interactive map from Scott McGee, indicating advances in some area, minor retreat in others and back and forth in others. In 2012 JIRP was back at the terminus creating the map below. There is no change at the east and west side of the margin since 2008 and 55 to 115 m of advance closer to the center.

TakuTerminusSurvey2012

Jaundhar Bamak Glacier tributary retreat, Tons River, Uttarakhand, India

The Tons River is in Uttarakhand India. The watershed is fed by more than 50 glaciers. The largest are Jaundhar Barak and Bandarpunch, the glaciers of Tons valley are notable for a thick mantle of debris cover, due to the terrain characteristics, and the avalanche fed nature of the glaciers (Pankaj et al, 2012). The Tons River Basin has one significant operational hydropower unit, the Mori Hanol Hydro Power Project (70 MW) with a diversion dam downstream of Mori village. There are other proposed projects in the basin. Mehta et al (2013) observed the spatial changes of Jaundhar Barak, Jhajju and Tilku glaciers in the Tons River basin between 1962 and 2010 using Landsat Satellite data, topographic maps and field surveys. They estimated the overall loss in area to be 3.6 km2 (5.4%) and frontal retreat of 1,700 m, ∼ 800 m and ∼ 700 m for the Jaundhar Barak, Tilku and Jhajju Glaciers. The debris cover (DC) makes it quite difficult to easily identify terminus (T) position using Landsat imagery, Google Earth Imagery is not good either.

tons river map
Map of Tons River basin glacier from (Pankaj et al, 2012)

tons base map
Jaundhar Barak Glacier in 2012 arrows indicate flow Debris cover=DC and Terminus=T, tributary glaciers of note discussed below A-E.

Here we use Landsat imagery to identify the retreat of five tributary glaciers that have fed or are feeding into the Jaundhar Barak from the ridge to its north from 2000 to 2012. Jaunhar Barak is a 19 km long glacier with a north and south arm, here we focus on the north arm. The glacier begins near 6000 m and quickly drains into the main valley, at 4900 m the debris cover begins and the lower 13 km of the glacier are debris covered to the glacier end at 3900 m . The tributary glaciers are each a potential income stream for the main glacier, which when lost lead to less snow and ice “income” for the main glacier and then thinning and retreat will follow. The Jaundhar Barak Glacier is The five tributaries are labelled A-E. A comparison of the 2000, 2011 and 2012 images below indicate that: At Point A in 2000 two arms of the tributary glacier joined and it flowed out of the high alpine basin it was in, by 2011 and 2012 the two glacier arms have separated and the glacier is confined to the upper basin. At Point B there is a well established glacier tongue that extends halfway from the tributary to Jaundhar Barak, and by 2012 this tributary terminus has pulled back 200 m, which is nearly 200 m of elevation change also. At Point C in 2000 this tributary joins the main valley glacier and a small tongue of blue ice, its contribution can be seen heading downglacier. By 2012 the Point C tributary no longer reaches the main glacier. At Point D in 2000 the tributary joins the main glacier and like the previous tributary contributes a small tongue of blue ice that heads down the Jaunhar Barak Glacier. By 2011 the Point D tributary is no longer reaching the main glacier. At Point E in 2000 this accumulation area for the glacier is nearly all covered with glacier ice, with only a couple of small bedrock areas seen below the Point. By 2012 the bedrock exposed has coalesced into a one kilometer region separating a portion of the upper glacier from the main valley glacier. The ice from this tongue still may reach the lower glacier via avalanching. The last decade of loss on tributary glaciers more than 10 kilometers above the terminus of Jaundhar Barak indicates that downwasting and retreat of this glacier will continue. This glacier follows the pattern of other glaciers in the Garhwal of the Himalaya in its retreat and downwasting, Jaonli Glaicer, Gangotri Glacier, Satopanth Glacier . It also will feeds hydropower projects as do the other glaciers.
tons river 2000
2000 Landsat Image of tributaries on north side of Jaundhar Barak Glacier.

tons river 2011
2011 Landsat image

tons river 2012
2012 Landsat image

Glacier du Tour Retreat, France

Tour du Glacier is in the Valle de Chamonix and is one valley north of D’Argentiere Glacier and two north of Mer de Glace. Here we examine the retreat of Glacier du Tour from 1988 to 2011 using Landsat imagery and Google Earth. In each image the purple arrow indicates the 1988 terminus. The yellow arrow the top of an icefall at 2650 m. The orange arrow a prominent turn in the Little Ice Age lateral moraine. The red arrow a location along the 2011 ice front. Point A is an area on the south side of the glacier that is thinning, and shows little residual snow accumulation. Point B is another location near the top of a small glacier across the border in Switzerland where ice is being lost at the top of the glacier. Point C is where the tributary flowing from below Aiguille du Tour joins the Glacier du Tour.tour de glacier ge. In 1988 the glacier terminated at 2200 m, the icefall was 1 km above the terminus and the Aiguille du Tour tributary flowed into the Glacier du Tour. At Point B glacier ice still crosses the ridge at the top of the glacier. By 1999 the had retreated 100 meters, the Aiguille du Tour tributary still reaches the main glacier but is less than 200 m wide. By 2004 the terminus had retreated 200 m (red line) and the glacier is still quite crevassed near the terminus. In 2009 the area of the glacier around Point A has lost nearly all of its ice cover. Several rock knobs are protruding through the ice, purple arrows. The glacier has retreated another 200 m since 2004. At Point C the Aiguille du Tour tributary has a narrow finger that reaches the main glacier. In the 2011 Landsat image the Aiguille du Tour tributary no longer reaches the main glacier. At Point B the ridge that had been ice covered connecting two glaciers is now exposed. There is no snow left on the southern section of the glacier above and flowing down to Point a. The icefall region is now just 500 m above the terminus. The activity of the icefall indicates a continued active flow. The Aiguille du Tour tributary and portion of the glacier feeding Point A do not have significant retained snowcover and are not in equilibrium. tour de glacier 1988
Landsat image 1988, purple arrow indicates the 1988 terminus.

tour de glacier 1999
1999 Landsat image.

tour de glacier 2004
2004 Google Earth image with a red line indicating terminus.

tour de glacier 2009
2009 Google Earth image. Purple arrows indicate bedrock knobs emerging from beneath the ice.

tour de glacier 2011
2011 Landsat image with a red arrow indicating the terminus.

Jaonli Glacier Thinning and Retreat, Uttarakhand India

Jaonli Glacier is in the Pilang basin which feeds the Bhagirathi River in Uttarakhand. The glacier is 20 km west of the well known Gangotri Glacier and 30 km east of Jaundhar Barak. The glacier is one valley north of the well studied Dokriani Glacier. Jaonli has a heavily debris covered terminus which slows the retreat of the actual terminus, while upglacier thinning has been quite rapid. Here we examine Landsat imagery from 2000 to 2012 to illustrate the change due to increased melting. The glacier provides hydropower as it passes three Hydropower plants generating 1430 MW, including the 1000 MW Tehri Dam and reservoir, which also provides flood control, such as this past week of June 17, 2013(second image). The Tehri Reservoir level rose 25 m within 48 hours which is a storage of approximately 1.3 billion cubic meters. Jaonli Glacier is a heavily avalanche fed from the huge wall of rock on its northeastern flank, as noted by light blue arrows. In each image the yellow and orange arrows indicate the same location for comparison of the width of debris cover. The purple and red arrow indicate where two tributaries flow down to meet the Jaonli Glacier.jionla profiletehri dam map 2007

In 2000 the clean ice region of the main valley tongue of the Jaonli Glacier is 400 m wide at the yellow arrow and 500 m wide at the orange arrow. The eastern tributary at the red arrow joins the main valley glacier. At the purple arrow two small ponds are developing as the tributary that does not reach Jaonli melts back. By 2012 the debris free ice surface is 100 m wide at the yellow arrow and 200 m wide at the orange arrow. The debris cover spreads across the glacier as the clean ice melts faster thinning, and the debris covered area is then on an increasingly wide and high ridge above the clean ice and the debris then falls and oozes down onto the cleaner ice. The tributary at the red arrow still reaches the main glacier but is now covered by debris. The two ponds have merged at the purple arrow to create a larger terminus lake. IN Google Earth the images are from 2011. The first is a cross ice view towards the red arrow tributary, indicating the same locations and the extent of the debris cover. The second image is a closeup of the terminus, with a pink arrow indicating the 2011 terminus, note river issuing here and large ice face. However, there are two other developing termini with lakes forming 1 km upstream of the main terminus, green arrows. This stagnant ice in between will continue to melt and collapse. The glacier has retreated 160 m from 2000 to 2012, but will undergo an additional one kilometer retreat to reach the lake locations. This glacier fits well the overall retreat in the region (Kulkarni et al, 2007).Dokriani Glacier retreated at a rate of 17 m/year from 1962-2000 (Bhambri and Bolch, 2011). In the nearby Tons River Basin Mehta et al (2013) noted the 1962-2010 retreat of three glaciers Jaundhar (34 m/year), Jhajju (15 m/year) and Tilku Glacier (13 m/year). jaonli glacier 2000

jaonli glacier 2012

jionla debris

jaonli terminus 2011