Dismal Glacier, British Columbia Prospects Match Name

dismal
Landsat image comparison from 1988 and 2015, red arrow indicates 1988 terminus and yellow arrows 2015 terminus. Purple arrows indicate thinning upglacier.

Dismal Glacier flows north from Mount Durrand in the Selkirk Range of British Columbia.  It drains from 2500 m to 1950 m and its runoff flows into Downie Creek that is a tributary to the Columbia River and Revelstoke Lake.  This lake is impounded by the BCHydro Revelstoke Dam which is 2480 MW facility.  Here we examine Landsat images from 1988 and 2015 to identify changes in this glacier.  The glacier snowline in the mid-August image of 2015 is at 2400  m just above a substantial icefall.  The glacier has retreated 640 m from 1988 to 2015.  The eastern extension at 2200 to 2300 m of the glacier noted by a purple arrow, has lost considerable area, indicating thinning even well above the terminus  elevation. Note thinning of this section of the glacier by 2015 after it joins the main glacier, it is separated by a medial moraine. The terminus in the 2009 Google Earth image has a low slope and is uncrevassed.  This indicates the terminus reach is relatively inactive, but does not appear stagnant.   Tennant and Menounos (2012) examined changes of the Rocky Mountain glaciers just east of this region and found between 1919 and 2006 that glacier cover decreased by 590 square kilometers, 17 of 523 glaciers disappeared and 124 glaciers fragmented into multiple ice masses. This will happen at Dimsal Glacier as it has at Cummins Glacier.  Bolch et al (2010)  observed a 15% area loss from 1985-2005 in this region.  The snowline has been above the icefall at 2400+ m in 2013, 2014 and 2015, indicative of negative mass balance that will lead to continued retreat.  The glaciers name is not due to its future prospects, but its future prospects are indeed dismal.
dismal glacier ge
revelstoke-dam-powerhouse-columbia-river-place
BCHydro image of Revelstoke Dam

dismal glacier
Google Earth image of Dismal Glacier terminus in 2009. Red arrow indicates 1988 terminus position, black arrows various recessional moraine features.

Haworth Glacier Retreat, Selkirk Mountains, British Columbia

Haworth Glacier in the northern Selkirk Mountains of British Columbia drains into Palmer Creek, which flows into Kinbasket Lake, and then the Columbia River. This glacier is often visited by climbers as the Canadian Alpine Club has a summer base camp near the terminus of the glacier. The glacier has a low slope and limited crevassing that makes it a good training ground for climbing. Menounos et al (2008) noted an advance of this glacier overrunning a stump that has since been exposed by retreat in the period from 3800 years before present, similar in timing to many glaciers in the region. The stump remained buried until recent exposure.
haworth map
Here we examine a series of Landsat images from 1986-2013 to identify the retreat and forecast whether the glacier can survive even current climate conditions. In each image the blue dots mark the snowline, yellow arrow is the 1986 terminus and the red arrow the 2013 terminus. In 1986 the glacier ended near the far end of the basin where a lake has since developed, yellow arrow. Snowcovers 30% of the glacier in the late summer of 1986, 55-65% is necessary for glacier equilibrium. By 1994 the glacier had retreated exposing the new lake basin, the glacier was 25% snowcovered. By 1998 the glacier had retreated 550 m since 1986, the glacier was 15% snowcovered. In 2009 the glacier was 20% snowcovered. In 2013 the glacier terminates at the red arrow indicating a retreat of 1000 m since 1986, 37 m per year. The glacier is 10% snowcovered. The percent snowcover in each year is much less than the 55% minimum needed for a minimum balance, the images are also not precisely at the end of the melt season. If a glacier does not have a consistent and persistent snowcover at the end of the melt season it has no “income” and cannot survive (Pelto, 2010). This glacier has managed to retain a very small area of snowcover, but given the ongoing thinning and the lack of avalanche accumulation on this glacier, it is unlikely to be enough to save this glacier. Bolch et al (2010) noted a 10% area loss for British Columbia glaciers from 1985 to 2005, Haworth Glacier is above this average. Tennant and Menounos (2013) noted that the fastest rate of loss on Columbia Icefield glaciers from 1919-2009 was during the 2000-2009 period. The glacier is not retreating as fast as some of the glaciers that also calve into lakes such as Columbia Glacier, British Columbia. Nearby Apex Glacier has retreated at a similar rate. Jiskoot et al (2009) observed the terminus change of 176 glaciers in the Clemenceau Icefield and adjacent Chaba Icefield, and noted an average retreat of 21 meters per year from the 1980’s to 2001.
haworth galcier 1986
1986 Landsat image

haworth galcier 1994
1994 Landsat image

haworth glacier 1998
1998 Landsat image

haworth glacier 2009
2009 Landsat image

haworth glacier 2013
2013 Landsat image