A River Runs 40 km Across the Greenland Ice Sheet

Supraglacial stream, on July 26, 2016 Landsat image, stretching 40 km across the ice sheet from the transient snowline, which marks the boundary between the percolation zone and the wet snow zone,  west toward the ice sheet margin, note black arrows.  

The Greenland Ice Sheet has experienced a significant increase in surface melt.  This is due both to warmer temperatures and enhanced melt due to a reduction in reflectivity-albedo. The expansion in melt area, duration and intensity (NSIDC, 2015)  has also generated large volume of meltwater transported via supraglacial streams.  Recent work by Tedesco et al (2016) and Kintisch et al (2017) illustrate three key reasons for the albedo change in the melt zone.

1) Upon melting and refreezing, ice crystals lose their branched shape, grow larger and rounder, which reduces the reflectivity of the snow by as much as 10%.

2) Satellite data show that the margins of the ice sheet have darkened by as much as 5% per decade since 2001. Dust trapped over the centuries has become concentrated at the melting edge of the ice sheet.

3)   The combination of algae and bacteria with dust generates a sludge—known as cryoconite. This dark material gathers in depressions decreasing albedo. Black and Bloom is a project focused on how dark particles (black) and microbial processes (bloom) darken and accelerate the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet

Tedesco et al (2016) noted the negative trend in albedo is confined to the regions of the ice sheet that experience summer melting. They also observed no trend during the 1981–1996 period. Their analysis indicates the albedo decrease is due to the combined effects of increased air temperatures, which enhances melt promoting growth in snow grain size and the expansion of bare ice areas, and to increasing concentration of dark impurities on ice surfaces. Kintisch et al (2017) noted the same mechanisms with warmer summers also enhancing microbes and algae growth on the wetter surface of the ice, producing more cryocontie, that reduces albedo absorbing more solar energy. Cryoconite is more spatially limited than the other mechanisms. They also observed that soot and dust that blow in from lower latitudes and darken the ice are also increasing.

The darker surface enhances melt which generates more meltwater largely drained in the melt zone by supraglacial streams. Smith et al (2015) documented the surface drainage in the ablation zone of the southwest GIS. They focused on documenting the distribution of over 500 high order stream channel networks in a 6812 square kilometer region, inland from Kangerlussuaq.  All of the stream networks terminated in moulins before the ice sheet edge (NASA, 2015).  This indicates that moulins are common, important and sparse.

Poinar et al (2015) observe the longest streams in the 30-50 km range. Here we examine two streams one in detail using Google Earth that is 30 km long and a 40 km long surface stream in 2016 observed in Sentinel 2 and Landsat images. That the surface rivers can travel this distance across the surface before draining via a moulin indicates that the glacier is not structurally like Swiss cheese (Pelto, 2015).  The Google Earth detailed view illustrates both the darker surface, the maturity and hydrologic efficiency of the thermally incised meltwater streams.

The stream observed in Google Earth in its mid-reach has an average of 15 m in width.  The slope of the ice sheet is 1/120 in this region, with the river beginning at 1320 m and ending at 1070 m.  Gleason et al (2016) examined numerous supraglacial streams and noted that supraglacial streams with a width of 15-20 m and slopes of 1/100 to 1/200 had a depth of 1.5-2.0 m and velocity of ~0.5 m/sec.  This suggests the stream here has a discharge  of 7-10 cubic meters per second. The darkness of the ice surface indicating a low albedo is also apparent.  The ice is not nearly as dark when standing directly on it as it is in the macro-scale.

[ngg_images source=”galleries” container_ids=”52″ display_type=”photocrati-nextgen_basic_imagebrowser” ajax_pagination=”1″ template=”/nas/wp/www/sites/blogsorg/wp-content/plugins/nextgen-gallery/products/photocrati_nextgen/modules/ngglegacy/view/imagebrowser-caption.php” order_by=”sortorder” order_direction=”ASC” returns=”included” maximum_entity_count=”500″]

The second stream is seen in a Sentinel  image from July 15 and a Landsat image from July 26. The black arrow indicate the stream that is 40 km long.  The stream extends from 110 km from the edge of the ice sheet to within 75 km. The stream begins near the transient snowline at 1650 m and ends near 1400 m, creating a slushy valley above the local percolation zone. The stream in early July flows through the wet snow zone. By the end of the July the lower section of the stream becomes a bare ice region, the upper remains in the  wet snow zone.

Supraglacial stream in mid-July Sentinel images stretching 40 km across the ice sheet from the transient snowline west toward the ice sheet margin. 

 

 

State of Alpine Glaciers in 2016-Negative for 37th Consecutive Year

Figure 1. Global Alpine glacier annual mass balance record of reference glaciers submitted to the World Glacier Monitoring Service.

Each year I write the section of the BAMS State of the Climate on Alpine Glaciers.  What follows is the initial draft of that with a couple of added images and an added paragraph.

The World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS) record of mass balance and terminus behavior (WGMS, 2015) provides a global index for alpine glacier behavior.  Globally in 2015 mass balance was -1177 mm for the 40 long term reference glaciers and -1130 mm for all 133 monitored glaciers.  Preliminary data reported to the WGMS from Austria, Canada, Chile, China, France, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Norway, Russia, Switzerland and United States indicate that 2016 will be the 37th consecutive year of without positive annual balances with a mean loss of -852 mm for reporting reference glaciers.

Alpine glacier mass balance is the most accurate indicator of glacier response to climate and along with the worldwide retreat of alpine glaciers is one of the clearest signals of ongoing climate change (Zemp et al., 2015).  The ongoing global glacier retreat is currently affecting human society by raising sea-level rise, changing seasonal stream runoff, and increasing geohazards (Bliss et al, 2014; Marzeion et al, 2014).  Glacier mass balance is the difference between accumulation and ablation.  The retreat is a reflection of strongly negative mass balances over the last 30 years (Zemp et al., 2015).  Glaciological and geodetic observations, 5200 since 1850, show that the rates of early 21st-century mass loss are without precedent on a global scale, at least for the time period observed and probably also for recorded history (Zemp et al, 2015). Marzeion et al (2014) indicate that most of the recent mass loss, 1991-2010 is due to anthropogenic forcing.

The cumulative mass balance loss from 1980-2015 is -18.8 m water equivalent (w.e.), the equivalent of cutting a 21 m thick slice off the top of the average glacier (Figure 2).  The trend is remarkably consistent from region to region (WGMS, 2015).  WGMS mass balance based on 40 reference glaciers with a minimum of 30 years of record is not appreciably different from that of all glaciers at -18.3 m w.e.  The decadal mean annual mass balance was -228 mm in the 1980’s, -443 mm in the 1990’s, 676 mm for 2000’s and – 876 mm for 2010-2016.  The declining mass balance trend during a period of retreat indicates alpine glaciers are not approaching equilibrium and retreat will continue to be the dominant terminus response. The recent rapid retreat and prolonged negative balances has led to some glaciers disappearing and others fragmenting (Figure 2)(Pelto, 2010; Lynch et al, 2016).

Below is a sequence of images from measuring mass balance in 2016 in Western North America from Washington, Alaska and British Columbia.  From tents to huts, snowpits to probing, crevasses to GPR teams around the world are assessing glacier mass balance in all conditions.

[ngg_images source=”galleries” container_ids=”7″ display_type=”photocrati-nextgen_basic_imagebrowser” ajax_pagination=”1″ template=”/nas/wp/www/sites/blogsorg/wp-content/plugins/nextgen-gallery/products/photocrati_nextgen/modules/ngglegacy/view/imagebrowser-caption.php” order_by=”sortorder” order_direction=”ASC” returns=”included” maximum_entity_count=”500″]

Much of Europe experienced record or near record warmth in 2016, thus contributing to the negative mass balance of glaciers on this continent. In the European Alps, annual mass balance has been reported for 12 glaciers from Austria, France, Italy and Switzerland. All had negative annual balances with a mean of -1050 mm w.e.  This continues the pattern of substantial negative balances in the Alps continues to lead to terminus retreat.  In 2015, in Switzerland 99 glaciers were observed, 92 retreated, 3 were stable and 4 advanced.  In 2015, Austria observed 93 glaciers; 89 retreated, 2 were stable and 2 advanced, the average retreat rate was 22 m.

In Norway, terminus fluctuation data from 28 glaciers with ongoing assessment, indicates that from 2011-15 26 retreated, 1 advanced and 1 was stable.  The average terminus change was -12.5 m (Kjøllmoen, 2016).  Mass balance surveys with completed results are available for seven glaciers; six of the seven had negative mass balances with an average loss of -380 mm w.e.

In western North America data has been submitted from 14 glaciers in Alaska and Washington in the United States, and British Columbia in Canada.  All 14 glaciers reported negative mass balances with a mean loss of -1075 mm w.e.  The winter of and spring of 2016 were exceptionally warm across the region, while ablation conditions were close to average.

In the high mountains of central Asia five glaciers reported data from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia.  Four of five were negative with a mean of -360 mm w.e.  Maurer et al (2016) noted that mean mass balance in the eastern was significantly negative for all types of glaciers in the Eastern Himalaya from 1974-2006.

Figure 2. Landsat images from 1995 and 2015 of glaciers in the Clephane Bay Region, Baffin island.  The pink arrows indicate locations of fragmentation.  Glaciers at Point C and D have disappeared.

 

Cook Ice Cap Outlet Glacier Retreat Lake Fromation, Kerguelen 2001-17

 

Comparison of eastern outlet glaciers of the Cook Ice Cap in 2001 and 2017 Landsat images.  Red arrow indicates a location of tributary separation. Pink arrow the 2017 terminus location of the northernmost glacier. Orange arrow the 2017 terminus location of the middle glacier.  Yellow arrow tip the 2001 terminus position of glacier ending in newly formed lake.  Green arrow the southernmost glacier 2017 terminus location. 

On the east side of the Cook Ice Cap on Kerguelen Island a series of outlet glaciers have retreated expanding and forming a new group of lakes.  Here we examine the changes from 2001-2017 along using Landsat imagery. Retreat of glacier in the region was examined by Berthier et al (2009) and is exemplified by the retreat of Ampere Glacier.  Verfaillie et al (2016) examined the surface mass balance using MODIS data, field data, and models.  They identified that accelerating glacier wastage on Kerguelen Island is due to reduced net accumulation and resulting rise in the transient snowline since the 1970s, when a significant warming began.

In 2001 at the red arrow is where the north tributary of a glacier ending in the northern most lake joins the main glacier.  In the second lake is a peninsula, marked with point A that the glacier terminus is 1 km from. The next two glaciers terminating at the yellow arrow and beyond the green arrow do not have lakes at their termini.  By 2014 the northern tributary has lost its connection with the main glacier terminating in the lake. The distance from the island for the middle glacier has increased.  A lake is forming at the yellow arrow. For the third glacier a lake has formed at the green arrow. In 2017 the northern glacier has retreated to the pink arrow a distance of  750 m and is no longer terminating in the lake. The terminus at the orange arrow has retreated  main terminus has retreated 900 m, expanding the lake it terminates in.   The glacier at the yellow arrow has retreated into a new lake basin, with a retreat of 850 m since 2001. The terminus is thin and in the Google Earth image indicates some substantial thin icebergs have separated from the glacier. The green arrow marks the 2017 terminus of the southern most lake. This glacier has retreated 950 m leading to the continued expansion of a new lake.  In just a decade we see the formation of two new lakes and the expansion of two others at the terminus of the eastern outlet glaciers of Cook Ice Cap, rapid landscape change driven by climate change.

2014 Landsat image of the eastern outlet glaciers of Cook Ice Cap.Red arrow indicates a location of tributary separation. Pink arrow the 2017 terminus location of the northernmost glacier. Orange arrow the 2017 terminus location of the middle glacier.  Yellow arrow tip the 2001 terminus position of glacier ending in newly formed lake.  Green arrow the southernmost glacier 2017 terminus location. 

Terminus of three outlet glaciers from left to right the green arrow, yellow arrow and orange arrow terminus glacier on the Landsat images.  The green arrows indicate places where the terminus or icebergs illustrates how thin the glacier ice is. 

Recent Climate Change Impacts on Mountain Glaciers – Volume

fig10-1

Landsat Image of glaciers examined in the Himalaya Range: Chapter 10 that straddles a portion of Sikkim, Nepal and Tibet, China. Notice the number that end in expanding proglacial lakes. 

This January a book I authored has been published by Wiley. The goal of this volume is to tell the story, glacier by glacier, of response to climate change from 1984-2015. Of the 165 glaciers examined in 10 different alpine regions, 162 have retreated significantly. It is evident that the changes are significant, not happening at a “glacial” pace, and are profoundly affecting alpine regions. There is a consistent result that reverberates from mountain range to mountain range, which emphasizes that although regional glacier and climate feedbacks differ, global changes are driving the response. This book considers ten different glaciated regions around the individual glaciers, and offers a different tune to the same chorus of glacier volume loss in the face of climate change. There are 107 side by side Landsat image comparisons illustrating glacier response.  Several examples are below: in each image red arrows indicate terminus positions from the 1985-1990 period and yellow arrows terminus positions for the 2013-2015 period, and purple arrows upglacier thinning.

[ngg_images source=”galleries” container_ids=”17″ display_type=”photocrati-nextgen_basic_imagebrowser” ajax_pagination=”1″ template=”/nas/wp/www/sites/blogsorg/wp-content/plugins/nextgen-gallery/products/photocrati_nextgen/modules/ngglegacy/view/imagebrowser-caption.php” order_by=”sortorder” order_direction=”ASC” returns=”included” maximum_entity_count=”500″]

There are chapters on: Alaska, Patagonia, Svalbard, South Georgia, New Zealand, Alps, British Columbia, Washington, Himalaya, and Novaya Zemlya. If you are a frequent reader of this blog you will recognize many of the locations. This updates each glacier to the same time frame. The book features 100 side by side Landsat image pairs illustrated using the same methods to illustrate change of each glacier. The combined efforts of the USGS and NASA in obtaining and making available these images is critical to examining glacier response to climate change. The World Glacier Monitoring Service inventory of field observations of terminus and mass balance on alpine glaciers is the another vital resource.  The key indicators that glaciers have been and are being significantly impacted by climate change are the global mass balance losses for 35 consecutive years documented by the WGMS.  The unprecendented global retreat that is increasing even after significant retreat has occurred in the last few decades (Zemp et al, 2015).  Last, the decline in area covered by glaciers in every alpine region of the world that is documented by mapping inventories such as the Randolph Glacier inventory and GLIMS ( Kargel et al 2014)

fig6-2

Landsat Image of glaciers examined in the Svalbard: Hornsund Fjord Region: Chapter 6.

fig5-1

Landsat Image of glaciers examined in the South Georgia Island: Chapter 5.

fig8-9

Landsat Image of Mount Baker glaciers examined in the North Cascades, Washington:  Chapter 8.

fig11-1

Landsat Image of glaciers examined in the Southern Alps of New Zealand S: Chapter 11.

 

 

Gangotri Glacier Expanded Melt Season & Melt Area in 2016

[ngg_images source=”galleries” container_ids=”22″ display_type=”photocrati-nextgen_basic_imagebrowser” ajax_pagination=”1″ template=”/nas/wp/www/sites/blogsorg/wp-content/plugins/nextgen-gallery/products/photocrati_nextgen/modules/ngglegacy/view/imagebrowser-caption.php” order_by=”sortorder” order_direction=”ASC” returns=”included” maximum_entity_count=”500″]

Purple dots indicate the transient snowline on Gangotri Glacier in the fall and early winter of 2016. Red arrow indicates the terminus of the glacier.

The Gangotri Glacier is the largest glacier in the Bhagirathi River watershed, situated in the Uttarkashi District, India. It is one of the larger glaciers in the Himalaya, and like all of the nearby Himalayan glaciers is retreating significantly. Gangotri Glacier provides hydropower as its meltwater  passes through three hydropower plants generating 1430 MW, including the 1000 MW Tehri Dam and reservoir and Maneri Bhali I and II, see map below.  From 1968-2006 the glacier retreated 800 meters, close to 20 meters per year (Bhambri et al, 2012). The glacier continues to thin and tributary inflow decline, while terminus retreat is slowe due to the thick debris cover that heavily insulates the ice. Bhambri et al (2011) inventoried glaciers in the upper Bhagirathi basin  and found they lost 9 square kilometers in area, 3.3% to the total, from 1968 to 2006. They further noted that recession rates have increased since 1990 and that the number of glaciers increased from 82 in 1968 to 88 in 2006 due to fragmentation of glaciers. From 1968 to 2006, the debris-covered glacier area increased by ~12% in the upper Bhagirathi basin.  Bhattachaya et al (2016) expanded on this work noting that the velocity of Gangotri Glacier declined during 2006-2014  by 6.7% from 1993-2006, this suggests reduced accumulation being funneled downglacier. They also noted an increase in the rate of debris-covered area expansion on the main trunk of Gangotri Glacier from 2006-2015, which is indicative of an expanding ablation zone. Bhattachaya et al (2016)  report a retreat rate of 9 m/year 2006-2015, which is less than before, but the down-wasting in the same period 2006-2015 was higher than during 1968-2006. The study reinforced that glacier retreat is a delayed response to climate change, whereas glacier mass balance is a more direct and immediate response. This underlines the importance of mass balance studies for assessing climate change impact on glaciers,that the World Glacier Monitoring Service has emphasized. Gangotri Glacier is a summer accumulation glacier with the peak ablation period low on the glacier coinciding with peak snowfall high on the glacier during the summer monsoon.  In the post monsoon period of October and November precipitation is low and melt rates decline, Haritashya et al (2006) note a sharp decline in discharge and suspended sediment load beginning in October. . Kundu et al (2015) from Sept. 2012 to January 2013 noted that the snowline elevation varied little, with the highest elevation being 5174 m and the lowest 5080 m.

The increase in temperature has led to a tendency for snowlines to rise in the post monsoon period and remain high into the winter season on many Himalayan glaciers. In 2016 this has been the case. On October 9, 2016  a Sentinel image indicates the snowline is at 4850 m on the main trunk and on the tributary Ghanohim Glacier the snowline, while it is 4750 m on the tributaryKirti Glacier.  A Landsat image from October 13th indicates the snowline on Kirti has risen to 4800 m, and remains at 4850 on the main trunk and Ghanohim Glacier.  By November 30th a Landsat image indicates the snowline has risen to 5400 m on the main trunk and Ghanohim, the snowline is at 5800-5900 m on the glaciers in the Swachhand tributary valley, at 5600 m on Maiandi Glacier and 5700 m on the last tributary entering from the north. Note the impact of radiational shading is apparent on the main trunk with the snowline descending down the middle of the main trunk from 5400 m to 5100 m and on Kirti Glacier which is too dark to confidently discern the snowline.  Temperatures are typically cool in December, but sunshine is common. A Sentinel image from December 8th and Landsat from Dec. 9th indicate that the snowline remains approximately the same as on Nov. 30th.  The accumulation area ratio is the percentage of a glacier in the accumulation zone and is typically above 50%.  On Gangotri Glacier in December 2016 the accumulation area ratio is only 20%, indicating a large mass balance deficit.  High winter snowlines on Chutenjima Glacier, Tibet, from October, 2015 to February 2016. This tendency is also noted at Nup La-West Rongbuk Glacier, on the Nepal-China border, West Hongu Glacier, Nepal and Lhonak Glacier, Sikkim.

gangotri-glims

Gangotri Glacier and its key tributaries, with the red line being the outline of the glacier from GLIMS.

bhagirathi-150411

Hydropower in the Bhagirathi River watershed

Norrearm Fjord Glacier Retreat, Greenland

norrearm-compare

Apostelens Glacier in Norrearm Fjord Landsat comparison from 1999 to 2016. Red arrows are the 1999 terminus location, yellow arrows the 2016 terminus location and purple arrows indicate an expanding bedrock ridge.

“Apostelens” Glacier drains east from a peak of the same name into an arm of Norrearm Fjord, which in turn is part of Lindenow Fjord in southern Greenland. The glacier is a short distance north of Kangersuneq Qingordleq, where recent retreat has led to glacier separation. The glacier is soon to lose its tidewater connection as has occurred at Tasermiut Fjord to the west.  This will result in a decline in iceberg production as well.

Here we examine Landsat imagery from 1999-2016 to identify glacier change.  In 1999 the Apostelens arm of Norrearm Fjord is largely filled by the glacier which extends to within 2.5 km of Norrearm Fjord, red arrow.  The tongue contains numerous ogives formed each year due to seasonal velocity changes through an icefall.  This is evident in the Google Earth image from 2004, where 24 ogives are evident on the low slope glacier tongue, in 1999 the number is over 30. By 2013 the glacier has retreated nearly 2 km from the 1999 terminus position, red arrow. In 2012 Google Earth imagery indicates increased crevassing near the front and the loss of most ogives.  New ogive formation is also hard to distinguish.  By 2016 the glacier has retreated 2.6 km and is nearing the headward limit of the fjord arm.  The collapse of the fjord tongue and its associated ogives indicates the loss of 30 years worth of volume flux that emerged from the icefall that generated the ogives.

Greenland tidewater outlet glaciers in this region have experienced substantial retreat since 1990, Weidick et al (2012) and Howat and Eddy (2011).  Murray et al (2015) examined 199 tidewater glaciers in Greenland and noted significant retreat of 188 of them.  Apostelens Glacier was not one of these, and soon will not be a tidewater glacier to be included in the list.

norrearm-ge

Apostelens Glacier in Norrearm Fjord Google Earth comparison from 2004 and 2012. Red arrows are the 2004 terminus location, and yellow arrows the 2012 terminus location.  Note ogives in 2004 and loss of them in 2012. 

norrearm-map

Map of the Norrearm Fjord region and Apostelens Glacier, with blue arrows indicating flow. 

Hagafellsjokull, Iceland Reflects Langjokull Thinning & Retreat

hagafellsjokull-compare

Landsat comparison of the terminus of Hagafellsjökull from 2000 and 2016.  The red arrows are the 2000 terminus, the yellow arrows the 2016 terminus.  Purple arrows indicate upglacier thinning. 

Langjökull is the second largest iceap in Icalnd with an area of over 900 square kilometers. The mass balance of the icecap has been reported since 1997 and his lost over 1 m per year during this period (WGMS, 2016).  Pope et al (2010) noted that the icecap has lost an area of 3.4 ± 2.5 km2 yr-1 over the decade from 1997-2007.  Pope et al (2010) noted that the loss of ice volume confirms previously published predictions that Langjökull will likely disappear within the next 200 years if current trends continue. A key outlet of  Langjökull is  Hagafellsjökull which terminates in Hagvatn. Hagafellsjökull ended a sustained post Little Ice Age retreat in 1970.  The ensuing advance of approximately 1 km ended by 2000.  Here we examine Landsat imagery from 2000-2016 to identify recent changes in this outlet glacier.

In 2000 the glacier terminated on an island in Hagavatn, red arrow.  The east margin of the glacier featured several locations where secondary termini overflowed a low ridge on the east side of the glacier.  By 2006 the glacier had retreated 500-600 m from the island.  By 2016 the terminus had retreated across its entire width by 800-850 m, 50 m/year, yellow arrows.  A closeup view from the Iceland online map application illustrates the 2014 terminus red dots. The end of the glacier has a low slope, low velocity and is debris covered.  The western side has terminated on land during this entire period and has approximately the same retreat rate as the eastern half that still ends in the expanding lake. There is little evidence of iceberg release into the lake, which helps explain the similar retreat rate. The low slope and upglacier thinning noted at the purple arrows indicate the retreat will continue.  In 2014 the transient snowline reached near the head of the glacier at over 1100 m.  In 2000, 2006 and 2016 the snowline with several weeks left in melt season ranged from 859-950 m. The retreat is similar to that of Norðurjökull another outlet of the Langjökull and Porisjokull.

langjokull-south-outlet-ge-2010

Google Earth view of the terminus of Hagafellsjökull in 2014. Red arrow is the 2000 terminus position and yellow arrow the 2014 position.

 hagafellsjokull-ismap

Online Iceland Map Viewer indicating the terminus of Hagafellsjökull in 2014, red dots.

hagafellsjokull-tsl

2006 and 2014 Landsat images of Hagafellsjökull indicating the transient snowline off the image in 2014 and at 850 m in 2006.

Desolation Valley, Alaska, Conversion from Glacier to Lake

 

desolation-compare

Retreat of Desolation-Fairweather Glacier from 2010-2016 in Landsat images.  The red arrow indicates 2010 terminus positions, yellow arrow the 2016 terminus. Pink arrow a delta exposed by lake level lowering. D=Desolation Glacier.

Desolation Glacier flows west from the Fairweather Range into Desolation Valley where in 1986 it joined with the Fairweather Glacier flowing from the north and the Lituya Glacier flowing from the south to fill the valley with glacier ice.  This is no longer the case, the valley once known for its long relatively flat area of largely debris covered ice, is mostly a lake now.  The valley has developed along the Fairweather Fault. Molnia (2007) noted that the tidewater termini of Lituya Glacier advanced ∼ 1 km since 1920 and continued to advance up to 2000 as it built an outwash plain reducing calving. Larsen et al (2015) noted thinning rates of 3 m per year for the Desolation Valley from Desolation Glacier north to Fairweather Glacier in the last decade (1994-2013).  Alifu et al (2016) identified that Desolation Glacier and Fairweather Glacier have lost 2.6% and 2.2% of their glacier area, respectively from 2000-2012. Only minor surface area changes were seen in Lituya Glacier during this period. They also noted that the mean snow line altitude of Fairweather, Lituya and Desolation increased by 120–290 m. Since 2012 extensive ice loss of the Desolation-Fairweather complex has occurred.  This is similar to the large rise in the transient snowline/equilibrium line noted by Pelto et al (2013) on nearby Brady Glacier.

In 1986 The Desolation Valley was filled with glacier ice from Fairweather Glacier to Liutya Bay.  By 2010 the southern half of the valley from Lituya Glacier to the outlet of Desolation Glacier into the valley had opened up and the terminus of Desolation Glacier and Lituya Glacier were at the red arrows, this represented a 5.3 km section of glacier lost. In 2013 the northern half of the valley filled by the Desloation-Fairweather Glacier was breaking up but still ice filled.  The Google Earth image from 2014 illustrates how broken up.  By 2016 the collapse was total and the new terminus is at the yellow arrow a 5.5 km retreat since 2010, this is a loss of 6.5 square kilometers of ice. The lake level also dropped which led to exposure of a lacustrine delta that had been submerged in 2013 and 2014, pink arrow. The lake has expanded in area, but lost in mean depth.  Will this continue to be a lake with continued retreat or become a braided river valley as the Fairweather Glacier continues to thin and retreat?  Desolation Glacier is no longer calving and its retreat rate should slow.  The terminus of the Fairweather Glacier should continue to retreat via calving in a fashion similar to glaciers around the world terminating in extensive lakes. Just to the north the North Fork Grand Plateau Glacier also experienced a large recent retreat with Landsat imagery in 2013 and 2014 indicating extensive calving from 2013 to 2015 and a retreat of 3.0 km, 1.5 km/year.  Fingers Glacier  is another nearby glacier that also is experiencing widespread retreat.  More images of the region are in a field blog on the region.

desolatiion-1986-2013

Retreat of Desolation-Fairweather Glacier from 1986 and 2013 in Landsat images.  The red arrow indicates 2010 terminus positions, yellow arrow the 2016 terminus. Pink arrow a delta exposed by lake level lowering. D=Desolation Glacier.

desolation-breakup

Google Earth image from 2014 of the disintegrating debris covered glacier.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tasermiut Fjord, Greenland loses its Glacier Connection

 

tasermiut-compare-ls

Landsat image sequence from 1999-2016.  Red arrows mark the 1999 terminus, yellow arrows the 2016 terminus and the purple arrow a tributary that detaches from Semitsiaq (S). Tasermiut Sermeq (T) retreats from the fjord. 

Tasermuit Fjord in southern Greenland is noted for its beauty, and until recently the fjord terminated at a glacier front. Currently no glacier reaches to the fjord. The retreat over the last two decades is similar to neighboring glaciers Kangersuneq Qingordleq and Qaleriq.  The loss of direct glacier connection is also occurring at Alangordlia. Here we examine Landsat images from 1999-2016 to observe glacier change. At the head of the fjord is Sermeq Tasermiut and on the east side is Sermitsiaq.

In 1999 the Sermitsiaq Glacier terminated at the eastern end of a small lake, red arrow.  Tasermiut Sermeq terminated in the fjord, red arrow.  By 2002 Sermitsiaq had retreated from the lake, while Tasermiut Sermeq still reached the fjord.  In 2013 Tasermiut Sermeq had retreated from the fjord and Sermitsiaq had retreated substantially from the lake and also had a significant tributary from the north detach, purple arrow. In 2016 Sermitsiaq has retreated 700 m since 1999, yellow arrow.  Biggs (2011) had noted a 610 m retreat of the glacier from 1987-2009, a slower rate than since 1999. Tasermiut Sermeq has retreated 300 m since 1999,and has a narrow steep tongue that will melt back quickly in the near future.

Murray et al (2015) examined 199 tidewater glaciers in Greenland and noted significant retreat of 188 of them. This is changing fjord dynamics, which will in the case of Tasermiut affect the marine biology, which has not been studied in any detail yet. Students on Ice 2014 Arctic Expedition provides exceptional imagery of this fjord and the Nanotarlik region.

tasermiut-ge-compare

Google Earth imagery of the region. illustrating the loss of fjord connection after 2009.

tasermiut-map

Map of the region 

Shatter & Shudder Glacier Retreat, British Columbia Lakes Form

shattter-terminus-compare

Red arrow is the 1985 terminus location and yellow arrow the 2016 terminus location.  Note the formatiion of new lakes at end of both glaciers. Purple dots is the transient snowline in August of each year.

Shatter and Shudder Glacier are at the eastern end of the Spearhead Range in Garibaldi Provincial Park, British Columbia. Osborn et al (2007) mapped the Little Ice Age extent of the glaciers compared to the 1990’s margins indicating a retreat of 300 m for Shatter Glacier and 700 m for Shudder Glacier (see below).  Koch et al (2009) identified the recession in area from 1928 to 1987 noting a 6% loss in Shatter Glacier and 22% loss for Shudder Glacier.  Koch et al (2009) identify an 18% loss in area from 1987-2005, indicating considerable recent change in the Park. Here we use Landsat imagery from 1985-2016 to update glacier change.

In 1985 there are no lake at the terminus of either Shatter or Shudder Glacier.  In 2002 a lake has formed at the terminus of Shudder Glacier, but not Shatter Glacier.  In 2016 both glaciers have proglacial lakes that have formed, and the terminus of both glaciers have retreated from the lakes.  This marks a retreat of 325 m on Shudder Glacier and 275 m on Shatter Glacier since 1985. Shudder Glacier retreated more rapidly in the first half of this period, while Shatter Glacier has experienced most of the retreat since 2005.

On Shatter and Shudder Glacier In 1987 the late August image indicates the snowline is at 2040 m, in mid-August 2015 the snowline is at 2250 m. In late August of 2014 the snowline was at 2120 m. In mid-August 2016 the snowline is at 2080 m. The higher snowlines are an indicator of mass loss for these glaciers that in turn drives retreat.  The region continues to experience significant loss in glacier area and development of many new alpine lakes with glacier retreat, five new lakes since 1987 just in this range with seven glaciers.  Spearhead and Decker Glacier are two other glaciers in the range that have developed new lakes since 1987. Nearby Helm Glacier is faring even worse.

 

shatter-tsl-compare

Landsat images from 1987, 2014 and 2015 indicating the transient snowline position at the purple dots on Shatter and Shudder Glacier.

spearhead-range-alpine-lakes-87-15

Pink Arrows indicate five new alpine lakes that have developed since 1987 as Spearhead Range glaciers have retreated

spearhead

Map of Spearhead Range glacier extent for LIA-Bold lines and 1987, light lines from Osborn et al (2007)

Findelengletscher, Switzerland Retreat & Hydrology Insights from David Collins

findelen compare

Landsat image comparison of Findelengletscher from 1988 to 2015. Red arrow indicating the 1988 terminus location and yellow arrow the 2015 terminus location.  The purple arrows indicate two tributaries connected to the main glacier in 1988 and now disconnected.

Findelengletscher along with Gornergletscher drains the west side of the mountain ridge extending from Lyskamm to Monte Rosa, Cima di Jazzi and Strahlhorn in the Swiss Alps.  It is the headwaters of the Matter Vispa.  This glacier was also the favorite field location for David Collins, British Glaciologist/Hydrologist from University of Salford who passed away last week. David had a wit, persistence and insight that are worth remembering. This post examines both David’s findings reaching back to the 1970’s gained from a study of glaciers in this basin and changes of the glacier since 1988 as evident in Landsat images. Findelengletscher drains into the Vispa River which supports for hydropower project, with runoff diverted into two hydropower reservoirs, Mattmarksee  operated by the Kraftwerke Mattmark producing 650 Gwh annually, and Lac de Dix operated by Grande Dixence that produces 2000 Gwh annually. There are two smaller run of river projects as well.

The Swiss Glacier Monitoring Network has monitored the terminus change of Findelengletscher since the 1890’s.  The glacier advanced 225 m from 1979-1986, retreated 450 m from 1988-1999 and retreated 850 m from 1999-2015. This is illustrated above with the red arrow indicating the 1988 terminus location and the yellow arrow the 2015 terminus location.  The purple arrows indicate two tributaries connected to the main glacier in 1988 and now disconnected.  The more limited retreated from 1988-1999 is evident in images below. The retreat is driven by mass losses with Huss et al (2012) noted as 1 m/year in the alps from 2001-2011. The snowline has typically been above 3250 m too high for equilibrium in the last decade. Melt at the terminus has typically been 7-8 m (WGMS).

Collins (1979) in work funded through hydropower looked at the chemistry of glacier runoff and found that glacier meltwater emerging in the outlet stream was enriched in Calcium, Magnesium and Potassium in particular versus non-glacier runoff, this led to a much higher conductivity. Collins (1982) noted the reduction in streamflow below Gornergletscher from summer streamflow events that reduced ablation for up to a week after the event. Collins (1998) noted that  a progressive rise of the transient snow line in summer increases the snow-free area, and hence the area of basin which rapidly responds to rainfall. Rainfall-induced floods are therefore most likely to be largest between mid-August and mid-September and in this period of warmer temperatures and higher snowlines. Collins (2002) Mean electrical conductivity of meltwater in 1998 was reduced by 40%. In the same 60 day period in 1998, however, solute flux was augmented by only 2% by comparison with 1979. Year-to-year climatic variations, reflected in discharge variability, strongly affect solute concentration in glacial meltwaters, but have limited impact on solute flux.  Collins (2006) identified that in highly glacier covered basins, over 60%, year-to-year variations in runoff mimic mean May–September air temperature, rising in the warm 1940s, declining in the cool 1970s, and increasing by 50% during the warm dry 1990s/2000s. In basins with between 35–60% glacier cover, flow also increased into the 1980s, but declined through the 1990s/2000s. With less than 2% glacier cover, the pattern of runoff was inverse of temperature and followed precipitation, dipping in the 1940s, rising in the cool-wet late 1960s, and declining into the 1990s/2000s.. On large glaciers melting was enhanced in warm summers but reduction of overall ice area through glacier recession led to runoff in the warmest summer (2003) being lower than the previous peak discharge recorded in the second warmest year 1947. Collins (2008)  examined records of discharge of rivers draining Alpine basins with between 0 and ∼70% ice cover, in the upper Aare and Rhône catchments, Switzerland, for the period 1894-2006  together with climatic data for 1866-2006 and found that glacier runoff had peaked in the late 1940s to early 1950s.

These observations have played out further with warming, retreat and more observations. Finger et al (2012) examine the impact of future warming on glacier runoff and hydropower in the region.  They observe that total runoff generation for hydropower production will decrease during the 21st century by about one third due glacier retreat. This would result in a decrease in hydropower production after the middle of the 21st century to keep Mattmarksee full under current hydropower production. Farinotti et al (2011) noted that the timing of maximal annual runoff is projected to occur before 2050 in all basins and that the maximum daily discharge date is expected to occur earlier at a rate of ~4 days/decade. Farinotti et al (2016) further wondered if replacing the natural storage of glacier in the Alps could be done with more alpine storage behind dams.

findelen

Google Earth image indicating flow of the Findelengletscher.

fiindelen 2 compare

Landsat image comparison of Findelengletscher from 1999 to 2016. Red arrow indicating the 1988 terminus location and yellow arrow the 2015 terminus location.  The purple arrows indicate two tributaries connected to the main glacier in 1988 and now disconnected.

Findelen terminus

Terminus of Findelengletscher in Google Earth.  The lower several hundred meters has limited crevasses, but is not particularly thin. 

 

Storglombreen Glacier Loss, Norway

storg compare Landsat

Landsat images from 199, 2002 and 2016 comparing glaciers draining into Storglomvatnet.  Red arrows indicate 1999 terminus locations, purple dots the snowline. 

Storglomvatnet has several glacier that terminated in the lake in 1999, Storglombreen Nord, Sorglombreen Sud and Tretten. This lake is the main reservoir, 3.5 billion cubic meters that feeds the 350 MW Svartisen Hydropower plant. The lake has an elevation of 585 m, while the power plant is at sea level. Paul and Andreassen,(2009)  examined glacier area and found overall almost no areal extent change from 1968-1999 of Svartisen region glaciers, including the three examined here.  Engelhardt et al (2013), note this was due to positive trends of winter balance between 1961 and 2000, which have been followed by a remarkable decrease in both summer and winter balances leading to an average annual balance of –0.86±0.15 m w.e.a–1 between 2000 and 2010 .Since 1999 there have been changes. The Norwegian Glacier Inventory  and the online digital atlas use this 1999 imagery and indicate glacier area  for Storglombreen Sud at 15.9 km2, for Storglombreen Nord  at 41.2 km2 and Tretten-nulltobreen at 5.9 km2.

In 1999 each of the glaciers reaches the lake shore at 585 m in four separate terminus fronts. The snowline in 1999 is at 1150 m. In early August 2002 the termini still reach the lake shore and the snowline is higher at 1250 m.  In 2001, 2002 and 2003 mass balance measurements by the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, indicate the snowline reached the top of the glacier at 1580 m. In 2016 the glacier termini no longer reach the lake shore and the snowline is again at 1150 m. It is evident in the Landsat image above that Storglombreen Sud and Tretten-nulltobreen no longer reach the lake shore, the southern most and northern most termini and arrows.  The two termini of Storglombreen Nord no longer reach the lake, though this requires higher resolution Sentinel 2 images to illustrate. Retreat of Tretten-nulltobreen from 1999-2016 has been 200 m, of Storglombreen Sud 250 m and of Storglmbreen Nord 100-200 m. There was limited calving into the lake and the retreat from the lake will not significantly alter the retreat rate of the glacier.  The high snowlines of recent years will lead to continued retreat. The retreat here is much less than on Engabreen which shares a divide with Storglombreen Nord, Flatisen  or Blåmannsisen.

svartisen west

Map of the glaciers in the region from the Norwegian Glacier Inventory online map application, based on 1999 images.

storg 2016 sentinel

Sentinel 2 image of the glaciers of Storglomvatnet from August 2016.  Notice that none of the termini reach the lake shore. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Winsvold, Andreassen and Kienholz (2014)